The Bitcoin Policy Institute<\/a> (BPI) has announced the launch of its Peer-to-Peer Rights Fund<\/a>, a strategic initiative aimed at safeguarding the decentralized, peer-to-peer integrity of the Bitcoin ecosystem. The fund’s mission is to defend non-custodial tools and their developers from regulatory overreach, ensuring that innovation, privacy, and user autonomy remain protected.<\/p>\n \ud83d\ude80Announcing the Peer-to-Peer Rights Fund<\/p>\n The mission? Safeguard the decentralized, peer-to-peer integrity of the Bitcoin ecosystem by defending non-custodial tools and their developers from regulatory overreach.<\/p>\n Learn more & make a tax-deductible donation here:\u2026<\/p>\n \u2014 David Zell (@DavidZell_) May 20, 2024<\/a><\/p>\n The Peer-to-Peer Rights Fund is dedicated to protecting the decentralized nature of Bitcoin through strategic litigation and advocacy. By supporting pivotal legal cases and providing essential regulatory guidance, the fund aims to establish a fair legal framework that promotes the growth and resilience of Bitcoin\u2019s open-source community.<\/p>\n BPI made the case that Bitcoin’s success lies in its peer-to-peer foundation, which distinguishes it from other electronic cash attempts, since this decentralized, open-source tool is powered by its users and operates free from the influences of greed, corruption, politics, or overregulation. Developers worldwide have built non-custodial tools that preserve Bitcoin\u2019s essence, including multi-signature wallets, Lightning Service Providers, and Coinjoin coordinators, which enhance security, facilitate low-cost transactions, and ensure privacy.<\/p>\n Recently, U.S. regulators have shifted their stance, threatening the non-custodial ecosystem by going after the developers of open-source tools and companies such as Tornado Cash, Samurai Wallet, Uniswap, and MetaMask. These cases could lead to unfavorable legal precedents, endangering the non-custodial Bitcoin ecosystem in the United States, since the government’s broad interpretation suggests that anyone facilitating fund transmission should be regulated under the Bank Secrecy Act, regardless of fund control. This could extend regulation to various non-custodial Bitcoin tools, affecting developers of hardware wallets, transaction-broadcasting nodes, miners, and collaborative custody services.<\/p>\n The fund\u2019s first project is defending Keonne Rodriguez and William Lonergan Hill, founders of Samurai Wallet. Rodriguez and Hill face charges<\/a> of conspiracy to commit money laundering and operating an unlicensed money services business.<\/p>\n “The prosecution’s attempt to classify Samourai’s non-custodial coinjoin tool as a money service business risks setting a damaging precedent that could impact the entire Bitcoin ecosystem,” stated\u00a0BPI co-founder David Zell. “By defending this case, the fund aims to ensure the court understands the technology and legal principles at stake, and seek a favorable result establishing that non-custodial privacy tools cannot be regulated under the Bank Secrecy Act.”<\/p>\n The outcome of Rodriguez and Hill\u2019s case may significantly influence the future of non-custodial Bitcoin tools and the broader decentralized finance landscape. Through this fund, BPI aims to ensure that innovation within the Bitcoin ecosystem can thrive under a fair and just legal framework, by providing critical resources for defense counsel, sponsoring amicus briefs, and supporting impact litigation.<\/p>\n